Socialization: There’s the rub…

This is often what ‘socialization’ leads to.

Think about the root of that word for a second. Social. It means “relating to society or its organization.” Socialization is the process whereby we adapt to society. In modern dog training that means putting dogs together as a prerequisite to acceptable social behavior. This is an example of editing reality to promote an agenda.

The assumption that socialization is automatically beneficial requires evidence that is not currently provided. If a dog has a good dose of genetically transmitted aggression, interaction with other dogs will trigger that behavior. More interaction means a faster ‘ramp up’ to skills associated with fighting. That is because normal, adult canines have to be able and willing to viciously fight at the drop of the a specific trigger. To ‘not fight’ is the anomaly for all canids. They fight BECAUSE they have been socialized, which elevates them to a fully adult repertoire. It’s like a terrier that kills it’s first rat, a Cattle Dog that heels it’s first cow and a pointer that points its for bird. No bird, no point. Birds ’causes’ pointing. More birds, more points.

What this really means is that the person blindly promoting ‘socialization’ is giving a one-dimensional view of dogs. That view ignores developmental processes that occur at puberty and later during full maturation. Dogs that are friendly as juveniles may become seriously dangerous dogs as they mature, regardless of how much they were socialized. Fully adult dogs may be passive around the vast majority of dogs and have an attitude about a single dog.

To see this clearly, consider ‘leg lifting’ as a metaphor. One day the dog is squatting to pee and then, suddenly, it lifts its leg. Socialization has no influence on that. Dogs that have been around other dogs graduate to leg-lifting and dogs that have never been around other dogs lift their legs at about nine months, too. If socialization is a prerequisite for having a well behaved dog, why doesn’t it work on such a passive, genetic trait?

Now we get to a big point. Socialization is promoted either implicitly or explicitly as a preventative fix for aggression. It is promised by people who do not know how to control aggression. I know that because the rule in day-care is that if a fight breaks out, the dog is banned. Think about that. A dog is in day-care for months as it matures and yet, one day, picks a fight. This mirrors the developmental behavior of leg lifting. One day it’s not there, the next day it is.

The only difference between aggression and leg-lifting is that if the dog lifts its leg at daycare, they clean it up. What they do not suggest is ‘more socialization’ to return the dog to a juvenile state of squatting to pee. That is because there is no connection between socialization and arrested development. You can’t turn the clock back. It won’t work with leg lifting and it won’t work with humping or fighting. Any rational person realizes that developmental behaviors are simply a matter of time. Once those behaviors wake up, you can’t put the genie back in the bottle. (Yes, that is a mixed metaphor) Guess what wakes them up? Socialization.

The More Important Component: Do the right things.
Male dogs that I own do not lift their legs, intact or not. They don’t fight, intact or not. They don’t attack other dogs whether they have been broadly socialized or not. I can extend those statements to my clients’ dogs if they ask in advance for those outcomes. This is regardless of socialization. My job is to sculpt a dog’s repertoire and give them a life devoid of problems. Socialization doesn’t do that. Planned, controlled training does that.

5 thoughts on “Socialization: There’s the rub…

  1. Impressive. I was always taught to believe socialization is one of the critical components of training a pup. My mother’s Doberman can definitely relate to this as she was non-aggressive at the dog park then turned rapidly so after a set of months of age… and here I thought it was more because she had gotten attacked.

    Glad to see you’re back to writing — keep them coming Gary, my dog training appetite is hungry for more!

  2. Brandon,
    I didn’t stop writing. I put out about 1,000 words a day on Facebook.

    Yes, so few people realize that ‘experience’ fighting wakes up all kinds of natural behaviors. They miss the point that ‘being attacked’ is normal and has genetically transmitted ‘normal’ responses. It’s almost laughable. You nailed it when you said…
    “and here I thought it was more because she had gotten attacked.”
    Bravo!

  3. We don’t ban dogs that attack, we correct the problem (I thought that was what bonkers were for????). We have 100 to 150 dogs a day, no fighting, no jumping on the handlers, no barking. PERIOD. Do we have edgey dogs that need to move away from the pack for a short period of time – sure. Isolate- no. After rest they come back. We are not tolerant of dogs that don’t follow our rules- but we then train them to do so. IF they just kick the dog out everybody failed– I view it as an opportunity to train.

  4. In training a male dog not to lift his leg, is it solely to reduce potential dominance issues? Great post btw.

    Regards
    Mark

    • Mark,
      The primary goal for me is to protect my plants in the yard. Also, a urine pool is a lot easier to clean than spatter all over the walls and floor. I don’t assume any connection between scent marking and a dog’s desire to rule the roost. That is because all males and some females mark, including ones that never challenge any other dog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *